Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein put an end to his royal career, but one royal expert believes there may be a possible "road to public redemption" for the former duke.

"I think that Andrew's quickest road to some kind of public redemption would be to engage with the American authorities and to shed some light on what he knew about Jeffrey Epstein and what he saw behind closed doors," royal historian Ed Owens told Daily Express.

"I think there is an understanding on his part that he is never going to restore his status, but he has an opportunity to put the record straight," Owens stated, adding that U.S. authorities "would come at some personal risk to Andrew."

Andrew could be in hot water again after Congress voted for the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files.

Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi told BBC's Newsnight he wants Mountbatten-Windsor to share what he knows with Congress. "I would go so far as to subpoena him," Krishnamoorthi said.

"I would go so far as to subpoena him"

Democrat Raja Krishnamoorthi, who sits on the Oversight Committee, tells @mattchorley that he wants Andrew to testify before Congress#Newsnight pic.twitter.com/uLwUS7J53A

— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) October 31, 2025

"Come clean. Come before the U.S. Congress, voluntarily testify. Don't wait for a subpoena," Krishnamoorthi continued. "Come and testify and tell us what you know."

Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre previously accused Mountbatten-Windsor of assault, and her posthumous memoir led to the scandal resurfacing. Following the book's release, Buckingham Palace announced the former duke would no longer be able to use the "prince" title or live at Royal Lodge.

"A lot of work has been done by the Palace to implement a policy which has the effect of once and for all keeping Andrew from public view," Owens noted. "They know that he is a weeping sore that can continue to weep and would doubtless rather avoid that happening publicly."

In a formal statement, King Charles III and Queen Camilla shared their support with survivors of abuse after stripping Mountbatten-Windsor of his royal estate.

"His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honors of Prince Andrew. Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor," Buckingham Palace said in a statement. "His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence. Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease and he will move to alternative private accommodation."

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the statement continued. "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Princess Diana was reportedly perplexed by Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

According to Andrew Lownie's bombshell book, Entitled: The Rise And Fall Of The House Of York, the late Princess of Wales was not the biggest fan of her former brother-in-law.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

What Did Diana Think of Andrew?

In the explosive tell-all, the author alleged Diana said Andrew's personality type "wasn't for me" and described him as "not a doer."

"He was very, very noisy and loud. It occurred to me that there was something troubling him," Lownie claimed King Charles III's ex-wife said about the former Duke of York. "He seems very happy to sit in front of the television all day watching cartoons and videos." 

Charles Strips Andrew of His Titles

The leader of England stripped Andrew of his titles and evicted him and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, from Royal Lodge over their ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the claims of misconduct against the father of two.

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that [Andrew] continues to deny the allegations against him," a statement from Charles and The Firm read. "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been and will remain with the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Andrew was also removed from his position as Knight of the Order of the Garter and Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order. Queen Elizabeth II previously removed his military and charity patronages in 2022. 

Andrew's Dismissal Might Ensure the Future of the Monarchy

Public relations expert Renae Smith believes Andrew's removal from royal life might have ensured the future of the monarchy.  "King Charles has proven he's a bit more of a doer, not just a talker. Definitely not as silent as his mother Queen Elizabeth II," she told Daily Express. 

"He's more decisive than people give him credit for and this shows he's willing to make uncomfortable calls when it protects the institution. It's a very different energy from the 'keep calm and carry on' approach of previous generations, it's firmer, cleaner and more modern. I'm a fan," she said. "That's how you control a narrative before it controls you. If they'd waited and then reacted to public outcry, it would make them look weak and able to be influenced."

Meghan Markle is under fire for kissing Prince Harry.

In the trailer for Netflix's With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration, the Duchess of Sussex shared a smooch with her husband. However, not everyone was convinced by the loved-up display.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration Trailer

In the special's preview, set to debut December 3, Meghan is seen preparing holiday dishes while welcoming her celebrity friends to help.

"I love the holiday season," the Suits actress gushes in the clip. "It's about finding time to connect with the people we love, embracing traditions and making new ones."

Harry appears in a short cameo as he kisses Meghan while eating a homemade Christmas treat.

A Body Language Expert Weighs in on Meghan and Harry's PDA

Body language expert Judi James isn't buying the couple's over-the-top display. "This kiss looks like something of a 'box-ticking' exercise from a woman who is seen skipping through her garden, clapping and smiling into mixing bowls to signal how she channels the magic of Christmas in the most idealistic way," she told Daily Express.

"The body language looks stylized and performative and this kiss with Harry appears to be a gesture of reward and praise for the fact that he has accepted a cameo role in this Meghan video," James continued.

The specialist claimed the Spare author looked "rather awkward and self-conscious" as he mixed "some small blob of food in a bowl or maybe enjoying his breakfast" while Meghan showered him with affection.

"He still wins a bestowed kiss from his ecstatic wife, though, who seems to be floating through this video on a bubble of festive goodwill and breathless excitement," she added. "Meghan stretches to kiss her surrendered-looking hubby with one hand around his neck and her own neck stretched and bared as she lands her lips on his in this expression of culinary-based love."

Meghan's Alleged Lack of Authenticity

The mother of two has struggled to build a loyal audience for the lifestyle show and a consumer base for her As Ever brand. According to Daily Express columnist Mieka Smiles, Meghan's hurdles stem from her inability to be authentic.

"A lot of her terrible press is brought on by her total inability to tell the truth about who she is. Because here in Britain we value truth-tellers," the journalist wrote. "Which is why Meghan's shtick has worn out so quickly."

Who knew holiday ornaments could be so divisive?

Social media users went wild after Britain's Selfridges department store released a line of Christmas tree decorations featuring Princess Diana and other members of the royal family.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Princess Diana Christmas Tree Ornament

The late Princess of Wales is commemorated in the form of a $48 ornament. However, the public seemed baffled by how little the object — which depicts Diana with her signature "bixie" hairdo and iconic sheep sweater — resembles the real woman.

Diana memorably donned two different red wool Warm & Wonderful sweaters to polo matches in the early '80s. Both featured a single black sheep amid a herd of white sheep. On the second occasion, the princess wore the sweater over a white collared shirt with a black tie at the neck.

View this post on Instagram

Social Media Reaction

People on the internet were outraged by the portrayal of Diana as well as other members of The Firm.

"They're all hideous!" one commentator exclaimed below an article about the decorations.

"Who would even want such a thing?" a second person questioned.

"You must be a fool if you pay that for a bauble," a third chimed in.

"I think they need to get a real artist to make these for that price," another added.

"They look cheap and nasty. Seems that Selfridges have lost the plot. They should be embarrassed at having produced such tat," another said.

"I can't imagine anyone buying these," an additional person noted.

The Christmas tree ornaments resembling Prince William and Kate Middleton also drew heat.

"I definitely wouldn't buy any of these. Catherine's is a mess!" one person pointed out.

"Poor Kate!" another said.

Diana Allegedly Hated Christmas

According to reports, Princess Diana did not enjoy Christmas — especially not when she was forced to spend it with the rest of the royal family.

According to royal biographer and former friend Andrew Morton, who wrote Diana: Her True Story, the mother of two despised going with King Charles III to the royal family's Sandringham Estate for the holidays.

"I do all the presents and Charles signs the cards," Andrew recalled Diana telling him, adding that Christmas at Sandringham was "terrifying and so disappointing" with "no boisterous behavior, lots of tension, silly behavior, silly jokes that outsiders would find odd, but insiders understood."

Diana's former hairdresser Richard Dalton also backed the claim.

"The princess just hated going to Sandringham for Christmas. She told me it was freezing cold and dinner had to be over by 3 o'clock," he told Kitty Kelley for her book The Royals.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were left out of Selfridges' royal family Christmas collection of ornaments. The British department store released a range of baubles with King Charles III, Queen Camilla, Prince William, Kate Middleton and Princess Diana as Christmas tree decorations, while the pair, who left the royal family in 2020, were nowhere to be seen.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Story in the Express abt Harry & Meghan being snubbed by Selfridges & their RF Christmas baubles. I think it's safe to say they'll be slightly happy abt that looking at the state of these. £38-£40 each. Must have got the same person as the wax museum in Poland to design them 😂😂 pic.twitter.com/lqOHPcGTIY

— Liv💙🇮🇪💙 (@livysmith99) November 21, 2025

Fans of Meghan and Harry quickly mocked the special launch. "Wow, and they say Meghan thinks so highly of herself. This is beyond cringe," one person wrote on X.

"I thought this was a joke, these are real Xmas baubles? I think H&M will be ok to have been missed out on this occasion," another said.

While the Sussexes weren't included in the drop, Meghan is working on her own holiday launch for As Ever and With Love, Meghan. "I love the holiday season," the Duchess of Sussex said in the trailer for With Love, Meghan. "It's about finding time to connect with the people we love, embracing traditions and making new ones."

Before she released the teaser, the Suits star discussed the special while on a panel for Fortune. "Well, the holiday special is coming out in November. It's a really good one," Meghan said when asked if her show was renewed for a third season.

Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex and founder of As Ever at Fortune Most powerful Women. pic.twitter.com/yfnBfw1KLb

— Alexis is sowing discord in the West (@ArchewellBaby) October 14, 2025

"So I think looking at that format — again, it's a year of learns — so we're able to say, 'Eight episodes for two seasons — it's a lot of work," Meghan added. "And having done Suits for seven years, I remember what goes into a production. I also recognize how much people want content in different sizes. Part of what we're testing out now is, it's amazing to sit and watch a show for 30 minutes, but how can I give you a recipe in two minutes? And where can I share that with you? And how that continues to grow As Ever."

Meghan and Harry's production company celebrated the news that the former actress is developing a series of Christmas-themed cooking episodes. "This December, join Meghan in Montecito for a magical holiday celebration," Archewell said in a statement. "Together, friends and family deck the halls, create holiday feasts, craft heartfelt gifts, and share lots of laughs — with simple how-tos to follow at home. It's a holiday wonder with warmth, tradition, and a generous dose of joy."

Sarah Ferguson is grappling with the loss of her lavish lifestyle, as the author and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor were forced to leave Royal Lodge due to their ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

"She is leaning on trusted staff members," British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard told Fox News Digital. 

Not only were Ferguson and Mountbatten-Windsor asked to leave Royal Lodge, but the former duchess lost career opportunities once it was revealed she called Epstein a "supreme friend" in an email.

"Her nerves are frayed. She is shaken to the core by the loss of her royal safety net. She fears further humiliation and worries that the serious allegations will affect her girls' standing," Chard claimed. "The couple's daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, have distanced themselves from their parents' scandals."

For years, Ferguson has stood beside her ex, but she could now change her stance.

"Sarah has made it well known among her staff and others that she no longer believes in Andrew and is preparing to go her own way after years of loyalty and public defense of her ex-husband," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich told the outlet. "She's described as 'massively on edge' and 'panicking' about her own future."

"While Sarah and Andrew are currently both still residing in Windsor, they are reportedly sleeping at different ends of the sprawling Royal Lodge," Fordwich continued. "They do get together to discuss their respective uncertain futures."

While they were once close, it seems their friendship is now strained.

"While their relationship had long been described as unusually close for divorced exes — cohabiting and supporting one another through public crises — there is now a real rupture," Fordwich said.

Royal biographer Robert Jobson revealed how Ferguson is handling the public scrutiny and isolation.

"I've known her for many years, and I'm not saying that she hasn't done anything wrong — because it has been documented what she did wrong," Jobson told Hello!. "What I'm saying is, is it the same? Should she be in the same boat as Andrew? I don't necessarily think so."

"I think we should all be aware of people's mental health, whether they're ex-prince, princess, ex-duchess, whatever," he added.

Before Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was kicked out of the Royal Lodge, Princess Beatrice's husband, Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi, reportedly helped the ex-royal with his mansion.

According to Daily Express, Mapelli Mozzi, who is a property developer, was helping his father-in-law rehabilitate his mansion. Over the years, there have been reports of the Royal Lodge needing extensive repairs, but the project will have to go on without the ex-duke. Mapelli Mozzi's role in the project was presumably axed due to his in-laws being kicked out of the estate.

In recent years, Mountbatten-Windsor has lived in the shadows of the royal family due to his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The ex-prince resigned from duties after Epstein's victim Virginia Giuffre accused the former Duke of York of assault, but the scandal resurfacing led to a new set of consequences. In Giuffre's posthumous memoir, the author wrote in detail about her alleged abuse.

Following the book's release, Buckingham Palace confirmed Mountbatten-Windsor will no longer be able to call himself "prince" or Royal Lodge home. Now, Mountbatten-Windsor and Sarah Ferguson will have to make new living arrangements.

"His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honors of Prince Andrew. Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor," Buckingham Palace said in a statement. "His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence. Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease and he will move to alternative private accommodation."

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the statement continued. "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Both Mountbatten-Windsor and Ferguson have avoided the public amid scrutiny.

Princess Beatrice has a royal title that not many know about.

While the 37-year-old is a member of the British royal family via her father, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, she is also connected to another country's monarchy through marriage.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Beatrice is also a Countess

Beatrice's husband, Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi, is an Italian count, which makes her and their two daughters countesses. (His son from a previous relationship is also a count.)

The princess and the British property developer, who is the son of Count Alessandro Mapelli Mozzi, were first romantically linked in 2018. They tied the knot two years later in 2020.

"They are very suited to each other and have known each other for a long time. I've never seen him so happy," Alessandro told DailyMail.com of the couple.

How Is Beatrice a Princess?

The mother of two was born a princess. Her paternal grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, was the reigning monarch from 1952 until her death in 2022.

According to letters patent from 1917, members of the royal family are entitled to princely titles and the HRH style only if they are male-line grandchildren of the monarch or the eldest son of the heir.

Is Beatrice's Title in Jeopardy?

After Andrew and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, lost their official titles over their past ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein, many wondered if Beatrice and her sister, Princess Eugenie, would suffer the same fate.

However, King Charles III reportedly wants his nieces to keep their places within The Firm.

"It was agreed that not only would there be no action taken by the king against Beatrice and Eugenie, but they would be allowed to accept new official royal roles," journalist Richard Eden told DailyMail.com.

His Majesty's former royal butler Grant Harrold told Daily Express, "King Charles III is very fond of his nieces and gets on with both of them really well. He will encourage them to come to family events, he will want them to be included in those private family celebrations."

How Beatrice and Eugenie are Coping with the Scandal

Beatrice and her younger sister have been doing their best to cope with their parents' scandal.

"The Yorks are an extremely close-knit family. The disgrace of Sarah Ferguson has followed that of Andrew, who has become an international pariah," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Daily Express.

"Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie will find their parents' predicament devastating," he added.

Meghan Markle's latest photoshoot is upsetting social media users.

The Duchess of Sussex appeared to honor Princess Diana in several different snaps in a photoshoot for the cover of the December 2025/January 2026 issue of Harper's Bazaar, which debuted online on November 19.

However, the public wasn't impressed with the tribute.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Social Media Users Rage Over Meghan's Apparent Diana Tribute

Meghan poses and dresses similarly to Prince Harry's late mom in multiple shots for the publication. In one picture, the Suits star sits on the ground, barefoot and cross-legged while wearing a white shirt and black trousers, just as Diana did in a shoot from the '90s. In another, Meghan dons a red gown similar to one worn by her late mother-in-law.

This is FOUL! pic.twitter.com/JFs37aD3No

— NaomiSky15 (@NaomiSky_15) November 20, 2025

"This is FOUL!" one X user commented below Harper's Bazaar's post about the With Love, Meghan star.

"Not just 'foul' but scary. I can understand that some clothing is classic and timeless – so it's easy to unintentionally duplicate some of Diana's outfits. But parroting Diana clothing items + outfits + studio poses, borders on psychotic, obsessive, abnormal behavior. This ain't healthy, y'all. Not at all," a second person wrote.

"Talk about cosplaying Diana again," a third person chimed in.

"I would feel weird if my husband was styled like my dead mom, personally," a fourth person said.

People Come To Meghan's Defense

But not everyone agreed Meghan was copying Diana.

"Not even close… stop being delusional," one X user said.

"You must've pulled a muscle with all that reaching!" a second person said.

Meghan's Paris Slip-up

Meghan recently weathered another scandal related to Princess Diana. During Paris Fashion Week in early October, the Duchess of Sussex made headlines when she took to social media to share a video of herself riding in a limo with her feet kicked up as the car drove near the Pont de l'Alma tunnel, where the former Princess of Wales died in a 1997 car crash.

⚡️ 😠 Meghan Markle sparked outrage after arriving in Paris👀🗣️Meghan arrived for Paris Fashion Week and filmed a video from the tunnel where Princess Diana died. The catch is that in the footage, she's riding in a car, her feet slouched on the seat. 👀Many people considered this… pic.twitter.com/HdOv1PkYMC

— mặt🌓trăng (@Ay911Moon) October 6, 2025

Meghan Faces Backlash

People on the internet were outraged over Meghan's social media post.

"Instead of avoiding those places that the late Princess Diana went to, she went and recreated them, how evil," one X user wrote.

"Why would she film the place where Prince Harry's mother died? Moreover, why would she post it on social media for the world to see? Why?" a second person wondered.

"This is beyond disturbing. She had nothing whatsoever to do with Princess Diana, so why is she doing it?" another questioned.

Royal Experts Weigh In On Meghan's Paris Post

One royalist was especially outraged by Meghan's social media move.

"I don't understand what on earth she was thinking. Well, she can't have been thinking. No adviser would ever advise doing something so strange," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told DailyMail.com.

"I'm sure she didn't mean to cause offense. She can't have been thinking, but it's insensitive beyond belief," he continued, calling Meghan's post "a complete absence of thought."

"Princess Diana's death is a tragedy that has scarred so much of Harry's life and I can't imagine he would find this very appropriate," he added.