King Charles III was reportedly enraged over what Prince Harry said about Queen Camilla in his memoir.

According to a source, His Majesty asked the Duke of Sussex and Meghan Markle to leave Frogmore Cottage after learning what his son wrote about the former Duchess of Cornwall in his 2023 tell-all Spare.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

What did Harry write about Camilla?

In the bombshell book, Harry labeled Camilla "the other woman" and his "wicked stepmother." He also accused her of interfering in his parents' marriage.

"In a funny way, I even wanted Camilla to be happy. Maybe she'd be less dangerous if she were happy?" the 41-year-old wrote.

Harry claimed that he and his older brother, Prince William, begged their father not to marry Camilla, but the couple tied the knot in 2005.

Charles claims Harry 'crossed the line'

Charles wasn't thrilled with Harry's remarks about his second wife.

"It was the last straw. Harry was well aware how Camilla would be a red line for his father and he crossed it with flagrant disregard anyway," a source told Daily Express.

"The king felt without a doubt it crossed a line. It was the ultimate act of disrespect," the insider said.

Sympathy for Harry

According to royal expert and historian Dr. Tessa Dunlop, Harry's constant need to speak out about his family comes from a place of sadness.

"The optics are terrible," she told Daily Express.

"Britain's response to the news has, on the whole, been gleeful. On one level the vitriol is understandable. Prince Harry had just lobbed several verbal hand grenades at his family and the former institution to which he belonged. But he did so from a position of weakness, on the outside, in pain and feeling side-lined," she explained.

Harry tries to make amends with Charles

Harry tried to patch things up with his dad during a recent trip to England. However, after the New York Times best-selling author accused Charles' royal staffers of leaking information about their meeting to the press, things between them soured again.

"The relationship between the duke and His Majesty the king is a matter for the two of them and the two of them only," an additional source told DailyMail.com.

"The men in grey suits should stay out of it," the insider added, referring to Charles' advisors.

A royal insider revealed Kate Middleton's life quickly transformed after Prince William proposed.

"Things definitely changed after the engagement. Before that, Kate had no royal protection, and the press followed her everywhere, leaving little privacy," ex-royal gardener Jack Stooks told Smooth Spins Casino. "I believe the pressure even contributed to their brief breakup. Once the engagement was announced, she was assigned personal protection officers, allowing her to move around safely and with less stress."

After Kate met Prince William at university, she continued living as a private citizen despite dating a royal. Once their commitment became public, the couple retreated into a more secluded life. "Public outings became rarer, but behind closed doors, she and William remained warm and down to earth," Stooks shared.

In the partners' engagement interview, Kate was enthusiastic and nervous about her transition into the monarchy.

@itvnews

15 years on from William and Kate's engagement announcement – on Talking Royals, our experts discuss how their relationship has developed over the years and look back on the day they gave their first interview as an engaged couple. You can watch or listen to the full episode wherever you get your podcasts. #itvnews #royals #royalfamily

♬ original sound – itvnews – itvnews

"It is obviously nerve-wracking because I don't know the ropes really. But I'm willing to learn quickly and work hard. I really hope I can make a difference and help even in the smallest way," Kate told ITV's Tom Bradby in 2010.

15 years later, the Prince and Princess of Wales have become the monarchy's most popular figures. Kate, who was raised outside of the aristocracy, is often praised for bringing a relatable spirit to the royal family.

"I think William and Kate, making sure that George, Charlotte and Louis have these normalizing experiences where they just interact with really normal people, actually gives them that grounded sense that they are human beings like the rest of us, they're not rarefied, they're not elevated and it could hopefully dilute that sense of 'I'm invincible,'" psychotherapist Lucy Beresford said in the Channel 5 documentary Prince George: How To Make a Monarch.

Royal correspondent India McTaggart shared a similar sentiment, noting that Kate has "brought so much from her Middleton upbringing and her family values, that I think has completely informed the way that she is raising the next generation of royals."

Zara Tindall broke royal protocol by sharing her thoughts on Brexit. Tindall, who previously competed in the Olympics as an equestrian, discussed how the vote impacted horse imports.

"If we're talking about legislation and how we have gone back in time, sort of post-Brexit, our travel time for horses and their welfare has definitely gone downhill," Tindall said while attending the World Horse Welfare Annual Conference at the Royal Geographical Society with Princess Anne, who is also an equestrian.

The Princess Royal, as President of the World Horse Welfare, accompanied by her daughter, Zara Tindall, departing after attending the Annual Conference at Royal Geographical Society in London, today! ✨

We love a mother-daughter moment 🥹🥰🫶🏻

🎥 At Horse Guards pic.twitter.com/FtVuxVSIJZ

— Princess Anne & Sir Tim Laurence ✨ (@TheLaurences_) November 21, 2025

"I know people are doing it less and less now because it's such hard work. It's more stressful on the horses than it used to be," Tindall continued, per Tatler. "It's got[ten] worse."

The Olympian isn't a working royal, but she is still expected to "support" King Charles III and avoid discussing taboo topics. However, Alastair Bruce revealed that royals can participate in elections without formally endorsing a candidate. "All members of the royal family, other than the sovereign, may vote. Traditionally, they do not," Bruce told The Mirror.

Historically, members of the royal family have avoided discussing their views because the monarchy is a nonpartisan institution.

"This is principally to protect the apolitical nature of their support to the monarch but also because, in the past, as royal dukes, many male members of the family were prevented by law from voting because they could sit as peers in the House of Lords," Bruce shared.

"When the Royal Family agreed to withdraw from exercising their rights to sit and speak in the House of Lords in 1999, it technically lifted the bar to vote in elections," he continued.

Zara typically avoids discussing politics, while her husband, Mike Tindall, is known for criticizing figureheads. During the rugby star's stint on I'm A Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here, Mike called politicians "f*****s" once former Health Secretary Matt Hancock joined the cast.

After years of defending her ex, Sarah Ferguson is distancing herself from Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

"She is discredited and appears to have abandoned Andrew insofar as we know," royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told Daily Express.

Mountbatten-Windsor's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein led to the end of his royal career, resulting in the stripping of his titles and him being kicked out of Royal Lodge. Due to his public downfall, Ferguson is no longer able to use her Duchess of York title or reside at her royal abode.

Ferguson is in hot water, too, after calling Epstein a "supreme friend," which led to her children's book being axed. Now, Ferguson has to figure out how to make money.

"If she is after a fast buck, she might well go back on Oprah or choose another outlet," Fitzwilliams said. "This would give her publicity."

"In the past, she was able to make comebacks after she was hit by scandals and was admired for this, with charities deserting her after it was proved that she lied regarding her links with Epstein," Fitzwilliams continued. "This seems highly unlikely. It depends on what her priorities are, how much money she actually has and what her plans are."

As more details emerge about the disgraced financier, Ferguson could suffer additional consequences.

"We will doubtless discover soon, she was a disaster as a working royal and is totally shameless," Fitzwilliams noted. "Also, if the interviews given by Andrew Lownie, author of Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, are anything to go by, a large amount is yet to be revealed, which could prove extremely embarrassing to her."

Wonderwall previously reported Ferguson's children's book being shelved highlights how her public image changed.

"This is yet another indication that she is now considered a toxic brand," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital. "Charities have dropped her, and friends are distancing themselves. She has a bleak future in England."

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams made a similar comment, stating, "The axing of her children's book shows she has no future as a children's author. It is highly unlikely she'll find a way back from this."

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is losing more than just his title, as one politician is scrapping a road named after him.

Mid and East Antrim council decided to start the "long overdue" process of changing Prince Andrew Way, a street located in Carrickfergus, Northern Ireland, following his several scandals.

"In recent weeks, as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor stepped away from some of the titles conferred on him, and now with the royal family removing his style, title and honors, we're now in the space to have this conversation," Alliance Party councillor Lauren Gray said in her proposal to Mid and East Antrim Council in Carrickfergus.

"Certainly with the level of public comment locally, it would seem we are long overdue in looking at what it would take to make this change," Gray continued.

'Prince Andrew Way' to be renamed after council scraps road's nod to disgraced royal

A council has agreed to start the process to change the name of a street which was named after Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Prince Andrew Way in Carrickfergus was named in 1986 to mark the… pic.twitter.com/HF8DiiauWD

— Mike Alderson FRSA (@OpenEyeComms) November 25, 2025

Mountbatten-Windsor's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and assault allegations put an end to his royal career. Years after the scandal came to light, Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre's posthumous memoir, which detailed her alleged abuse at the hands of the ex-royal, led to King Charles III taking away his brother's princehood.

Following His Majesty's announcement, Gray suggested renaming Prince Andrew Way and choosing something that honors Queen Elizabeth II.

"Carrickfergus has a long connection with the royal family, and when I tabled this motion, it was with the idea of honoring a long-serving monarch, a strong female leader in a male-dominated world," Gray said.

"Since then, many conversations have taken place, online and across different community settings, and what is absolutely clear is that the people of Carrickfergus deserve to have a say in how we progress this going forward," she continued.

The council's interim chief executive, Valerie Watts, noted that the decision could greatly impact the 10 addresses on the road.

"Clearly, I respect the views of the chamber this evening on this particularly emotive issue; however, what I do need to advise members is that there is no council policy for changing the name of a street, and it's not just straightforward," Watts said.

"Residents absolutely need to be consulted because it can have far-reaching implications for them, such as changing your address for your bank account, credit cards, driver's licence, utility bills etc., however, it can be done and council do have the power to change street names," Watts continued.

Despite Watts' concerns, Gray doubled down on her request.

"I think we are aware of the process that this will take… I think the important thing here tonight is that we're taking that step forward to empower the officers and the staff team to look at how we can make this happen," Gray replied.

Meghan Markle is under fire for kissing Prince Harry.

In the trailer for Netflix's With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration, the Duchess of Sussex shared a smooch with her husband. However, not everyone was convinced by the loved-up display.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration Trailer

In the special's preview, set to debut December 3, Meghan is seen preparing holiday dishes while welcoming her celebrity friends to help.

"I love the holiday season," the Suits actress gushes in the clip. "It's about finding time to connect with the people we love, embracing traditions and making new ones."

Harry appears in a short cameo as he kisses Meghan while eating a homemade Christmas treat.

A Body Language Expert Weighs in on Meghan and Harry's PDA

Body language expert Judi James isn't buying the couple's over-the-top display. "This kiss looks like something of a 'box-ticking' exercise from a woman who is seen skipping through her garden, clapping and smiling into mixing bowls to signal how she channels the magic of Christmas in the most idealistic way," she told Daily Express.

"The body language looks stylized and performative and this kiss with Harry appears to be a gesture of reward and praise for the fact that he has accepted a cameo role in this Meghan video," James continued.

The specialist claimed the Spare author looked "rather awkward and self-conscious" as he mixed "some small blob of food in a bowl or maybe enjoying his breakfast" while Meghan showered him with affection.

"He still wins a bestowed kiss from his ecstatic wife, though, who seems to be floating through this video on a bubble of festive goodwill and breathless excitement," she added. "Meghan stretches to kiss her surrendered-looking hubby with one hand around his neck and her own neck stretched and bared as she lands her lips on his in this expression of culinary-based love."

Meghan's Alleged Lack of Authenticity

The mother of two has struggled to build a loyal audience for the lifestyle show and a consumer base for her As Ever brand. According to Daily Express columnist Mieka Smiles, Meghan's hurdles stem from her inability to be authentic.

"A lot of her terrible press is brought on by her total inability to tell the truth about who she is. Because here in Britain we value truth-tellers," the journalist wrote. "Which is why Meghan's shtick has worn out so quickly."

Meghan Markle is not letting go of her royal title, Duchess of Sussex.

The former actress appears to use "preemptive branding" to ensure people always view her as royal, in case Prince William strips her and Prince Harry of their titles.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

How Meghan is using "preemptive branding"

Before sitting down for an interview with Harper's Bazaar in New York City, journalist Kaitlyn Greenidge claimed Meghan's title was declared upon entering the room.

"We're in a grand brownstone on the Upper East Side that belongs to one of Meghan's friends. When I enter, the house manager announces, 'Meghan, Duchess of Sussex,' even though we appear to be the only other two people in the house," she wrote.

According to an additional report, the Suits star had her royal title announced to the room while visiting children at the La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles, Calif.

Meghan's more frequent use of the Sussex surname is a strategic move to ensure that it's part of her identity, The Royalist claimed.

Why Meghan and Harry's titles could be removed

After King Charles III officially stripped Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of his honors due to his connection to Jeffrey Epstein, William will likely be strict about who gets to use their title when he ascends the throne — especially since Meghan and the Spare author left England in 2020.

William could also examine the titles of Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, as well as those of his own children, Prince Louis and Princess Charlotte, who would also have their honors halted until they can decide whether they wish to serve as working royals.

Meghan faces backlash over using her title

Many people believe Meghan should stop using her title if she's not working for The Firm. "Not surprised at her pretentiousness, but I am surprised it's taken others this long to notice," one X user wrote.

"She really wants people to use that title to associate it with her and thinks the British royal family wouldn't be able to take it from her. She doesn't get that it doesn't belong to her, and they can take it if they want, doesn't matter if she styles herself with it or not," a second person said.

"M is deluded if she has her doorman calling out her title. Her royal title is worth nothing to her now, and she won't have it much longer, so why be all desperate overusing it?" a third chimed in.

Will Sarah Ferguson air out The Firm's dirty laundry?

After the former Duchess of York was stripped of her titles and evicted from Royal Lodge over her connection to Jeffrey Epstein, one expert thinks Ferguson could go scorched earth on her former in-laws in a tell-all interview.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Will Sarah tell all?

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams believes the 66-year-old has nothing to lose by spilling the monarchy's secrets. "She is bad news and what she said might not be believed, but it [a potential TV interview] really would cause trouble," he told Daily Express.

"These are just rumors, of course," he continued. "There is little doubt that if Sarah Ferguson consented to some sort of kiss-and-tell interview, there would be plenty of takers and they would pay her substantial sums."

Running the risk of embarrassment

While Sarah might want to make a quick buck and seek revenge, a bombshell sit-down could be humiliating, given the rumors already made public about how she acted as a royal.

"Also, if the interviews given by Andrew Lownie, author of Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, are anything to go by, a large amount is yet to be revealed, which could prove extremely embarrassing to her," Fitzwilliams said.

"We will doubtless discover soon. She was a disaster as a working royal and is totally shameless," the reporter added.

Sarah is considered a 'toxic' brand

When friendly emails between the philanthropist and the late criminal from 2011 were made public, numerous charities severed ties with Sarah. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's ex-wife's children's book was also shelved amid the fallout.   

"This is yet another indication that she is now considered a toxic brand," commentator Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital.

"Charities have dropped her and friends are distancing themselves. She has a bleak future in England," the journalist claimed.

Meghan Markle — who continues to use her Duchess of Sussex title professionally — is being called out for trying to stay close to the royal family.

"It's her way of irritating other royals. She walked out of being a royal six years ago, but she's still desperate to be something, but just can't do it," royal biographer Angela Levin wrote on X alongside her new Harper's Bazaar's cover.

It's her way of irritating other royals. She walked out of being a royal six years ago but she's still desperate to be a something but just can't do it. https://t.co/6bIgQDvnL6

— Angela Levin (@angelalevin1) November 20, 2025

In the first season of With Love, Meghan, Meghan corrected Mindy Kaling for using her maiden name, but she failed to clarify whether she goes by "Meghan Sussex" or "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex."

@evie.magazine

Meghan Markle's new show is receiving a lot of hate online. One of the more viral moments from "With Love, Meghan" was when Mindy Kaling repeatedly referred to Markle as "Meghan Markl." Markle, smiling, corrected her: "It's so funny you keep saying Meghan Markle; you know I'm Sussex now." #royalfamily

♬ original sound – Evie Magazine

"It's our shared name as a family, and I guess I hadn't recognized how meaningful that would be to me until we had children," Meghan told People while promoting the premiere of her cooking show, which featured the awkward moment with Kaling. "I love that that is something that Archie, Lili, H and I all have together. It means a lot to me."

"I think as the kids get older, they're so excited about, 'Oh my gosh, Mama and Papa, how did you meet?' I think that will come with time as they get older, but for right now, a huge part of our love story is that we share the name Sussex," Meghan added.

In a separate interview, Meghan revealed her passport and legal identification lists "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" as her legal name.

"But it's a complicated one for people to understand, because a last name is not typical in that construct," Meghan said on The Circuit, adding Sussex is "not" her last name, "but it's used roughly, or loosely, rather."

"It sounds so silly to say. And I get it, because I'm American, and then I went there, and I started to understand," Meghan explained. "But then you come back and as an American, you go, 'I'm so confused.'"

Meghan and Prince Harry were given the title Sussex, a county in the U.K., after their historic wedding day.

"It's a dukedom," Meghan said. "So, that's the truth of it. But at the end of the day, you know, yes. My legal name is Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, but Sussex for us works as our family name, and it's the name that we share with our children."