Princess Charlotte might not be able to keep her royal titles.

Due to a specific monarchy rule regarding Prince George, Prince William's only daughter is at risk of not being able to use the honor.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

The rule that risks Charlotte's title

According to protocol, when William becomes king of England, George will likely assume the title of Prince of Wales. This honor has been held by the father of three and King Charles III.

However, this will spell trouble for Charlotte. "Her right to be Princess of Wales flies out the window when her brother gets the official title of Prince of Wales," a broadcaster at the OSSA channel claimed.

"A royal lady can only be a princess if she's married to a prince or the daughter of a prince," they added.

What could happen?

Since William will eventually become the leader of England, the 10-year-old will likely take on a different title.

Like her great-aunt Princess Anne, Charlotte could take on the title of Princess Royal. However, she can use it only after the 75-year-old passes away.

Charlotte makes history

Charlotte is third in line to the throne, a monumental moment for the monarchy.

"For the first time in British history, the spare is a princess, even though she has a younger brother," historian Dr. Nige Fletcher said in a Channel 5 documentary via Daily Mail.

"Princess Charlotte is in line after George, after a change in the law and she now outranks her brother, Prince Louis," he said.

What role could Charlotte have within The Firm?

According to royal commentator Phil Dampier, Charlotte will have to decide when she's older about whether she wants to be a senior working member of The Firm.

"William and Kate [Middleton] see George as primus inter pares — first among equals. Yes, he's the future king, but the way things are going, Charlotte and Louis may have major roles too," he said via The Royal Observer.

Author Sally Bedell Smith told The I Paper, "I would imagine Charlotte will be part of the picture. I'm not so sure about Louis."

Could Charlotte choose her own path?

Despite being born into a special position, royal expert Ingrid Seward thinks Charlotte still has the freedom to choose her own destiny.

"It's not like it was in Charles' youth. Nowadays, children make their own decisions. It's just so different from when even William was brought up. I think children have immense choices now that they didn't have even 15 years ago," she said via The Royal Observer.

Princess Anne and Queen Camilla have drastically different approaches to official gatherings.

According to GB News, palace aides said the two women are "totally opposite" when it comes to reviewing paperwork. The Princess Royal is described as a "relentless consumer" of briefing papers, while Camilla reportedly has a more "instinctive" style.

Their conflicting leadership style was highlighted during Anne's recent trip to Singapore. The Times reported Anne, known for being well-prepared for events, was "reeling off facts" while visiting the Rolls-Royce headquarters. The publication noted that if Camilla had been there, she likely would've "barely skimmed" her briefs, as she prioritizes "finding people how they are."

Despite their opposing work styles, Anne has praised Camilla for fitting in with the royals.

"I've known her a long time, off and on," Anne said of her sister-in-law in Camilla in Charles III: The Coronation. "Her understanding of her role and how much difference it makes to the King has been absolutely outstanding."

"This role is not something that she would have been a natural for, but she does it really well. And she provides that change of speed and tone," she continued.

Anne isn't the only person who's noticed Camilla's growth, as royal experts often applaud how the queen, once known as King Charles III's mistress, reshaped her public image.

"What Camilla did… she worked really hard at looking after Charles," royal expert Ingrid Seward told Fox News Digital. "Once she was married to Charles, she really took on the burden of royal duties, which isn't easy for someone [who] hasn't been brought up to it."

Prior to Charles' cancer battle, Camilla had a demanding schedule.

"Imagine going to a very grand wedding every single day and having to get up, dressed up, go out, meet people and talk to a lot of people you're never going to meet again," Seward continued. "That is quite exhausting every single day. And this is for a woman [who]… was an army housewife. She was used to slopping around in her jeans, doing the gardening, going to her little shed and doing some painting, doing a bit of cooking, not really ever getting dressed up."

"But so suddenly to be thrust into that world was quite exhausting for her," Seward added.

People are chomping at the bit for a tell-all interview with Sarah Ferguson.

According to a source, the former Duchess of York is being offered large sums of money for a bombshell sit-down after being banished from the royal family due to her connection to Jeffrey Epstein.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Ferguson might tell all

After being evicted from Royal Lodge and having her children's book axed from publication, Ferguson is likely weighing her options. "Sarah and her team have had offers from all over the world for a sit-down," one insider told The Sun about the reported six-figure proposals.

"She's thinking things over very carefully," the source said. "She and her team know a televised interview would be make or break for her in terms of salvaging her reputation."

"It would also give her the chance to spell out the fact she knew nothing about what Epstein and his associates were doing in terms of abusing girls," the insider continued.

Ferguson fights back

The mother of two reportedly feels persecuted by The Firm and believes she has less culpability than Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

"Sarah is actually quite keen to answer questions as she strongly believes she's done nothing wrong and been harshly treated," the source claimed.

"She has to find money and somewhere to live next year," the insider continued. "Sarah is bruised like never before by events and things like the book being pulped have damaged her income."

The Palace panics

As Ferguson decides whether to sell her story, Buckingham Palace staffers are worried she might go "rogue" and reveal shocking secrets.

"There's a danger of her going rogue and saying things that could cause embarrassment for King Charles III and Queen Camilla, or other members of the family," a second source said.

"But there's not much they can do to stop her," the insider continued. "Andrew has had his chances to tell his story. Now it's Fergie's time."

Ferguson tries to win back public opinion

While Ferguson could feel inclined to tell her side of the story, she'll do so carefully in order to win back public opinion.

"She needs to take time to re-establish herself before she considers what to do," a third source added. "If she does do a TV interview, she won't run off and do it immediately."

Ferguson defends herself from Epstein allegations

The 66-year-old also wants the world to know she had no involvement in Epstein's crimes against young women. "Andrew is unlikely to be keen, as an interview would be Sarah's chance to distance herself from him and explain she knew nothing," the same insider said.

"Sarah has always said she had no idea what Epstein and Andrew, were up to and why would anyone tell her?" the insider continued. "She's the mother of two girls after all. She admits she knew Epstein and the reality is that she cultivated a friendship because of his wealth. But that doesn't mean she knew what he was doing behind closed doors."

In 2025, managing multiple Facebook accounts is still a common strategy for marketers, media buyers, affiliate advertisers and automation pros. Whether you're running ad campaigns, managing multiple niches or building engagement farms, having just one account doesn't cut it anymore. Especially if you're working at a large scale, that's why marketers, media buyers and growth hackers are opting to buy Facebook accounts in bulk.

But here's the thing: Not all Facebook accounts are the same. Some accounts are well-aged, verified and look real. Others are cheap, fake or poorly managed, and they usually get banned within days, sometimes even hours. If you're spending money on bulk accounts, you want them to actually work. You want accounts that can pass Facebook's checks, stay active and help you get the job done.

In this post, we'll walk you through five simple but important ways to buy good-quality Facebook accounts in bulk, without wasting your money. This guide will help you stay one step ahead, whether you're just getting started or you're an experienced account manager.

Why Buying Facebook Accounts in Bulk is Important

If you want to grow your business online, whether through ads, affiliate marketing, outreach or automation, having only one Facebook account is no longer enough.

Here's why purchasing accounts in bulk makes sense.

Avoid Being Shut Down

Facebook is strict. If you run ads, post links or do anything that looks even slightly aggressive, your account can get flagged or banned. If you only have one account, your whole operation stops. But if you have multiple accounts ready to go, you can easily switch and keep moving.

Scale Faster

Assume you have discovered a successful campaign or advertising strategy. Do you want to double down? With bulk accounts, you can run the same campaign across multiple accounts, reach new audiences and scale much faster than if you were limited to one.

Split Testing Made Easy

Do you want to try different ad creatives, audiences and offers? Spread your tests across multiple accounts rather than doing everything on one (and risk exceeding limits). This allows you to achieve faster results and avoid account fatigue.

Run Ads in Different Regions

Accounts tailored to a specific country or region are sometimes necessary. Purchasing accounts from multiple GEOs allows you to run more effective localized campaigns, join regional groups and target specific demographics.

Reduce Risk

No matter how careful you are, some accounts will eventually get flagged or banned; it's part of the game. But if you have a stockpile of accounts, it's not a big deal. You're not putting all your eggs in one basket.

Stay Under the Radar

Facebook may consider it suspicious if you use the same account for ads, automation, scraping and posting. However, when you spread your actions across multiple accounts, each appears more "normal" and has a lower chance of causing warnings.

Proven Strategies for Purchasing High-Quality Facebook Accounts in 2025

1. Use Trusted Telegram and Forum Sellers

Even in 2025, Telegram is still one of the most popular underground Facebook account marketplaces. Many sellers use semi-private channels, particularly those with substantial sums. Sellers provide aged, verified PVA (phone-verified) and unverified accounts, as well as region-specific profiles for geo-targeted advertising.

But here's the catch: There are tons of scammers. Some sell low-quality or recycled accounts. Others take your money and disappear.

That's why it's critical to:

● Stick with reputable sellers and look for active channels with long histories.

● Check for reviews, comments and feedback.

● Avoid sellers who have just appeared recently or who do not post regularly.

● Request samples or small test batches (e.g., 5-10 accounts).

Other platforms to explore:

● Z2U, AccsMarket, AccFarm: more structured marketplaces with seller ratings.

● Forums like OGUsers, BHF.io and Cracked.to are popular in the gray-hat scene.

These platforms frequently host bulk sellers, but you will still need to vet them.

Tip: Before making a large purchase, message the seller, ask questions and test their response time. If they can't handle your questions, they probably can't handle your order either.

2. Choose Aged Over Fresh Accounts

When it comes to Facebook accounts, older = safer.

Facebook "trusts" accounts that have been around for a while. That's why aged accounts (created 1–5+ years ago) are more likely to:

● Bypass Facebook's initial red flags

● Survive ad account creation

● Look more natural in group joins, ad approvals and activity

Fresh accounts, while cheaper, often:

● Get hit with phone/email verification immediately

● Are flagged for suspicious activity

● Get banned quickly when used aggressively

If you're running serious operations, don't cheap out. Fresh accounts may cost $0.50–$1 each, but if they don't last a day, you're wasting time and money. Aged accounts, particularly those with some activity, are usually worth the premium ($3-$10+, depending on quality and GEO).

Tip: Ask the seller specifically.

● When was the account created?

● Has it been active?

● Is it PVA (phone verified)?

● What country is it from?

Go for accounts made between 2018–2021 for a good mix of age and stability.

3. Verify Quality Before You Buy

Not all "bulk Facebook accounts" are created equal, even when they're aged.

A quality account typically includes:

● A real-looking profile picture and cover photo

● Some level of timeline activity posts, likes, friends

● A unique name and email (not duplicates or bots)

● No recycled content; many bad sellers use the same name/photo combo hundreds of times

Low-quality accounts are often created in mass using scripts or bots, with fake details and poor personalization. Facebook's detection systems catch on to these patterns fast.

Always ask the seller:

● Can you send a few samples?

● Are these accounts created manually or generated?

● How many friends/followers do they have?

Tip: Run a reverse image search on the profile photo from a sample. If it shows up on stock photo sites or forums, the seller is reusing content; it's a red flag.

4. Match Accounts to the Right GEO/IP

This is one of the most common reasons accounts get banned quickly: IP mismatch.

If you buy an account that was created in Vietnam and log into it from Germany (on your home IP), Facebook immediately sees that something's off. That's when you get messages like:

● "We noticed a login from an unusual location."

● "Please verify your identity."

Or worse, the account gets locked or disabled.

To avoid this:

● Buy accounts from the same country or region where you plan to use them

● Use residential proxies or mobile proxies from the same GEO

● Consider using anti-detect browsers (like Dolphin, AdsPower, or Multilogin) that can simulate device and location fingerprints

Tip: Ask the seller which country the accounts are based in, and make sure your IP setup matches it before your first login.

5. Buy from Sellers with Panel or Dashboard Access

If you buy 50, 100 or even 500+ accounts, you prefer not to get screenshots or jumbled messages.

Professional sellers will offer:

● Delivery through CSV/Excel files with login credentials

● Access to a dashboard or control panel (to request replacements, filter accounts, and so on)

● Bulk management tools

● Some might even provide API access if you're automating your system

This type of setup saves time, reduces mistakes and demonstrates that the seller is serious about bulk selling rather than just flipping random accounts.

Also, look for replacement guarantees. A good seller will replace non-working accounts (dead on arrival, locked on first login, etc.) within 24–72 hours, no questions asked.

Tip: If a seller is managing accounts manually and can't provide bulk exports, they're not equipped for real volume; skip them.

Last Words

Buying Facebook accounts in bulk can be a wise decision, but only if done correctly. The goal isn't just to "buy more accounts." It's to buy accounts that actually work, stay alive and help you scale your campaigns without constant issues. Whether you want to buy Apple accounts, Facebook accounts or any other platform, this blog covers the ways you can buy them confidently.

Focus on:

● Quality > quantity

● Reputation > low prices

● Structure > chaos

Investing a bit more upfront saves you hours of frustration later.

Princess Anne, who is known for speaking her mind, didn't hold back at the height of Sarah Ferguson's "toe-sucking" scandal.

Toward the end of Ferguson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's marriage, the ex-duchess was photographed in France with American "financial advisor" John Bryan. While on vacation, Bryan was seen kissing the redhead's feet, leaving Anne enraged, per a source.

"She entered the breakfast room to find everyone reading the story and fled," royal biographer Andrew Lownie wrote in Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York. "One person, who was present, told the duchess' biographer Chris Hutchins that the Princess Royal 'came close to throttling' Sarah, and at dinner told her what she thought of her: 'There was not one voice raised against Anne. Prince Andrew's anger melted into sadness, and he buried himself in the special reports compiled for the Queen, which she did not hesitate to let him read.'"

A servant alleged Ferguson "acted in the strangest way…You would have thought she was the person wronged, as if she had every right to go on holiday with another man, kiss and cuddle him, and the only person who had behaved wrongly were the photographer and the editors of the newspapers who had published the pictures."

Decades after the couple's divorce, Mountbatten-Windsor and his ex-wife found themselves in the midst of a public downfall. Mountbatten-Windsor and Ferguson were kicked out of Royal Lodge due to the assault allegations against the former duke. Not only has Ferguson been pushed out of the mansion, but reports of her calling Jeffrey Epstein a "supreme friend" led to businesses and charities cutting ties with her.

Wonderwall previously reported that Ferguson is allegedly considering writing an explosive memoir to make some income.

"Money has never been an issue for Sarah," a source told Daily Express. "She spent more than she had, and somebody else always picked up the tab. She's been very well taken care of over the years by various boyfriends, friends and acquaintances."

"Yet for the first time in a good while, she is now seriously worried about how on earth she's going to maintain her lifestyle," the insider continued. "She's too toxic to touch for every single brand and charity she'd previously worked with, and even the lavish freebies she used to be gifted have stopped."

Ferguson could follow in Prince Harry's footsteps, as he previously revealed family secrets and private arguments in Spare.

"With no substantial income coming in, Sarah is now looking to follow in the footsteps of Prince Harry and is willing to pen a tell-all memoir about her time with Andrew and how she was treated by the Royal Family after their split," the source shared. "She has a lot of diaries and evidence of the backstabbing, scandals and cover-ups. For the right amount of money, she is willing to spill everything, but she's hoping to make enough money that it will give her a nice little nest egg for the rest of her life."

Meghan Markle viewed royal life as restrictive during her brief stint as a working duchess.

According to Daily Express, royal biographer Tom Quinn claimed the Suits star viewed the monarchy as "a kind of prison." In his book Kensington Palace, Quinn said that the "initial glamor" of being royal "wore off," leaving Meghan "horrified."

One builder told Quinn that Meghan and Prince Harry turned Frogmore Cottage into a "Californian condo."

Meghan seemed annoyed at the living arrangements, stating, "I don't want to retire to rural obscurity."

"Meghan realized that living there would be like living in the Russian steppe," a source told Quinn. "Its remoteness made Kensington seem like the center of the universe."

Throughout their relationship, the Sussexes complained about paparazzi, but Quinn argued that settling into Frogmore Cottage didn't shift the public's interest.

"As Meghan and Harry quickly discovered, their flight to Windsor did not mean an escape from the world's enquiring eye; instead, it revealed to that world a lack of foresight," Quinn wrote.

@gleamygleamyglamglam

The LIE that Her Royal Highness Princess Meghan the Duchess of Sussex said royal life was inauthentic and she hated wearing pantyhose is just untrue. She simply stated that wearing pantyhose was inauthentic for HERSELF. 🤦🏽‍♀️ I think Meghan was trying to show the difference between being a duchess as a working royal and not and being able to wear what she likes. As a working royal she had to uphold certain dress rules. #meghanmarkle #meghansussex #princeharry #royalfamily

♬ original sound – Shajuana

Years after returning to California, Meghan joked about how different her life was in the U.K.

"I had to wear nude pantyhose all the time," Meghan told The Circuit when asked about her time in the royal fold. "Let's be honest, that was not very myself. I hadn't seen pantyhose since the '80s, when they came in the little egg? That felt a little bit inauthentic, but that's a silly example."

"But it is an example of when you're able to dress the way you wanna dress, and you're able to say the things that are true, and you're able to show up in the space really organically and authentically, that's being comfortable in your own skin. And that's, of course, had different chapters in my life," Meghan continued. "But right now, no, I don't feel, I don't feel that I need to prove anything."

@lastinglooks

Meghan Markle explains why she never wore color in the UK. 🇬🇧 #meghanmarkle #harryandmeghan #harryandmeghannetflix #meghanmarklefashion #fashiontok #lastinglooks #fyp

♬ Smiles & Sunsets – ultmt. & Hz.

In Harry & Meghan, Meghan hinted at trying to avoid taking attention away from her in-laws.

"Most of the time that I was in the U.K., I rarely wore color. There was thought in that," Meghan said in the documentary. "To my understanding, you could never wear the same color as Her Majesty [Queen Elizabeth] if there's a group event, but then you also shouldn't be wearing the same color as one of the other more senior members of the family."

Prince William and Prince Harry's feud started years before Spare was published.

"I think the moment that we realized that there were tensions between the brothers was after I printed a story in Vanity Fair about William just urging Harry to take his time because they were engaged," royal expert Katie Nicholl told The Sun.

"Of course, William had taken many years before he proposed to [Princess Catherine] because he wanted her to be his wife. He wanted her to be able to know that this was what she wanted for her life, too," Nicholl said, referring to the Waleses' decade-long courtship.

Nicholl said the beginning of the end for the siblings was when Harry was offended by William's protective approach.

"And I think, you know, what was meant to be well-intended brotherly advice landed really badly with Harry," Nicholl said. "And I think it was the start of the real unravelling of their relationship."

"I mean, Harry really, it really hurt him that he felt he didn't have his brother's backing over Meghan," the biographer continued.

Harry and Meghan's whirlwind romance began in 2016, before getting engaged one year later. The duchess later suggested she felt rejected by the royal family and British media, leading to them stepping back from their senior-level roles.

William has avoided discussing his rift with Harry publicly, but his rumored concerns about the Sussexes seem to have come true.

"I think that William was, you know, like any brother, was probably just keeping an eye out for him by saying, do you think this is happening rather quickly?" Nicholl shared. "What do you really know about this girl? Should you not spend some more time getting to know her? Which had a bad reaction."

"He was really, really unhappy about that. He couldn't reconcile himself about that," she added. "Post then, it's just been a gradual unravelling of the relationship. I'd been told that at Christmas, when Harry and Meghan went to stay with William and Kate."

@thisisheart

Prince Harry says a "constructive conversation" needs to happen in private… 👀 #princeharry #princewilliam #kingcharles #royalfamily

♬ original sound – Heart

While Harry has returned to the U.K. to see King Charles III, the duke and his sibling have yet to reunite.

"There have been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family," Harry told the BBC. "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight anymore, life is precious."

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's strange behavior is coming back to haunt him.

According to Andrew Lownie's book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the Yorks, the disgraced royal allegedly exhibited odd behavior toward women in his school days — and even in his older years.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Mountbatten-Windsor allegedly targeted women

Mountbatten-Windsor allegedly tended to "annoy, provoke and humiliate women and girls" at social gatherings and official events with practical jokes, Lownie wrote.

"A strong and juvenile characteristic of his is to take advantage of his position to humiliate others who may not be able to respond," the writer claimed.

A source told the author, "His [Mountbatten-Windsor]'s idea of fun is to get guests at parties to close their eyes then place an open tube of mustard between their outstretched hands and get them to clap. The spectacle of someone receiving a faceful of mustard gives him great joy."

What did Mountbatten-Windsor allegedly do?

In the book, Lownie recalled the former Duke of York messing with a media personality at a professional gathering.

"At a society event in 1992, he unzipped broadcaster Tania Bryer's evening dress the full length of her back," the writer explained.

People recall run-ins with Mountbatten-Windsor

According to writer Craig Brown, Mountbatten-Windsor was an embarrassment at events when he was a teenager.

"The only time I ever encountered Prince Andrew was more than 40 years ago, at a large house party in Scotland. I was 19 years old, so he would have been about 17," he told Daily Mail in 2019.

"Over breakfast, three pretty girls who were sharing a bedroom told the rest of us that the Prince had barged into their room in the early hours of the morning, saying: 'There's a ghost in my room, so I'm going to have to sleep here,'" Brown added.

"Needless to say, they booted him out and for the rest of his stay he was that stock figure of English comedy, popularized by Benny Hill, the pompous oaf whose lascivious moves make him a laughingstock," the author said. "Prince Andrew was young then and he is old now, but, judging by the recent events, he has yet to learn his lesson."

Mountbatten-Windsor's disgrace

King Charles III officially removed Mountbatten-Windsor's titles and evicted him from Royal Lodge over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the misconduct allegations against him.

"I'm sure he's feeling humiliated and, by all accounts, angry. You have to remember that he has consistently protested his innocence," royal correspondent Jennie Bond told The Mirror. 

"Therefore, he feels wronged. But the reality is he now has just a few weeks left before he has to leave Royal Lodge, which has been his home for more than 20 years," she added. "One thing he could do to show some remorse (for, at the very least, his bad judgment in befriending Epstein) is to cooperate with the Congressional committee and tell them what he saw and what he knows. At the moment, though, that seems unlikely."

Sarah Ferguson might be ready to tell all about the royals.

According to a source, the disgraced Duchess of York wants to get back at King Charles III after being stripped of her titles and evicted from Royal Lodge over her ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

MORE: Follow Wonderwall on MSN for more top news

Ferguson has an 'appetite for revenge'

A source told Daily Express that Ferguson has an "appetite for revenge" and is "not happy" over His Majesty's decision to kick her and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor out of their home.

Despite divorcing in 1996, the 66-year-old and her ex-husband resided at Royal Lodge together for nearly 17 years and only paid "peppercorn rent."

Ferguson 'needs' cash

TalkTV host Mark Dolan thinks Ferguson is out of options and might have to reveal the family's secrets to make money.

"She feels that she's been thrown under the bus, that it was Andrew's ill-advised relationship with the disgraced ex-financier and therefore, she's got the record to set straight," the media personality told Sky News Australia.

"She needs the cash, and it's very possible that she will sign a million-dollar deal to spill the beans. The big problem is for Charles because this whole scandal threatens to taint his entire reign as monarch," he added.

A potential interview could 'cause trouble'

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams feels publications are chomping at the bit to get a sit-down with the mother of two.

"She is bad news and what she said might not be believed, but it [a potential TV interview] really would cause trouble," he told Daily Express.

"These are just rumors, of course," he continued. "There is little doubt that if Sarah Ferguson consented to some sort of kiss-and-tell interview, there would be plenty of takers and they would pay her substantial sums."

Ferguson's 'toxic' brand

Not only was Ferguson removed from royal life, but she was also dropped by numerous charities, and her children's book was scrapped.

"This is yet another indication that she is now considered a toxic brand," commentator Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital.

"Charities have dropped her, and friends are distancing themselves. She has a bleak future in England," the journalist said.

Charles is looking out for Beatrice and Eugenie

Despite Ferguson and Mountbatten-Windsor being banished from The Firm, Charles is ensuring their daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, remain in the royal fold.

"Whatever people might think of Andrew, the girls are kind, hardworking and want to help if they can," a source told Vanity Fair. "The monarch is fond of his nieces and doesn't want them to suffer because of their father's downfall."