Marie Claire 1 / 5

By Drew Mackie

Could Lea Michele suffer from an identity crisis? Granted, any young actor who achieves such a high level of fame so quickly would come down with a bad case of "Who am I?" But Michele seems to be making a concerted effort to be a lot of things at once.

Think about this: the majority of her fans know her only as Rachel Berry, the uptight songbird on "Glee." Seemingly in an effort to broaden her appeal -- and perhaps her fanbase so as to include more straight guys -- Michele took it all off for a photo spread in the British Marie Claire, covering up the most important parts but still showing a lot more side-boob than we'd ever see on "Glee."

RELATED VIDEO: Lea gabs about 'Glee'

So with such a sexy spread, Michele probably let slip some juicy details about how unlike "Glee" her personal life is, right? Nope. Weirdly, the article has her talking about how she's pretty damn vanilla, her only vice being a habit of getting tiny tattoos that apparently don't show up in nude photo spreads. She doesn't smoke. She doesn't do drugs. She doesn't even especially drink: "These days I have one glass of wine and I'm completely gone… I've never been a 'Lets go out and have a cosmopolitan' kind of girl. I don't even think I've ever tasted a cosmopolitan before." Huh. So the spread basically amounts to "Hey, look at my sideboob, but still think of me as a good girl." (E! Online columnist Ted Casablanca summed up the irony nicely with his headline "Topless, Tattooed Lea Michele Swears She's a Homebody."

Conflicting takes on Lea Michele aren't anything new, however. Her role on "Glee," for example, has her playing an unpopular dork despite the fact that Michele would be considered conventionally attractive by most anyone's standards. The blog Feministing even coined a term for this: "Liz Lemoning," in honor of Tina Fey's "30 Rock" character, who, like Rachel Berry, is obviously attractive beneath whatever unflattering clothes she's wearing. "In reality, those 'ugly' women look an awful lot like the beautiful ones," Feministing points out. It may well be that Michele decided to strip for Marie Claire in an effort to combat that perception that she's somehow any less beautiful than she actually is.

RELATED: See Tina glammed up for Vogue magazine

For the record, Rachel Berry herself has two distinct halves: On one hand, she's an lovely and earned girl determined to get the most out of life, on the other, however, she's a tightly wound pain-in-the-ass with a tendency to annoy those around her. According to Casablanca, PR folks are pushing hard to keep people from noting any similarities with Michele in real life.

Even Michele's Emmy dress -- a knockout, per most fashionistas -- isn't helping our perception of the girl inside. TV guide fashion critic Lawrence Zarian praised the Oscar de La Renta gown, but still noted that it edged on being "too-mature." I thought so too. Michele looked beautiful -- but also about ten years older than her actual age. As Kelly Osbourne noted on Joan Rivers' post-Emmys fashion roundtable, Michele shouldn't try to look older while she can still pull off fun, youthful dresses.

RELATED: Read Wonderwall's review of 2010 Emmy fashion

So that brings us back to the original question: Who the hell is Lea Michele? Is she a naughty girl who poses naked or is she still an innocent? Is she earnest and talented like her Glee character or is she unpopular and aggravating like her "Glee" character? Is she perfect for her role on the show or is she desperately trying to distance herself from it?

Maybe she's all of these things at once, and it's only the public that needs to make her be one thing or another, just so it's easier to say, "Oh, Lea Michele. She's like this." Or maybe Michele really is still figuring herself out, and she's the one who will one day say, "Oh, Lea Michele. She's like this." Maybe time -- and future photo spreads -- will tell.